Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostels
XML is a type of data that they export from their system that you can incorporate into your Web site programs. It can make it look like you have your own booking engine on your Web site (at your own URL), even though you are going through Hostelworld's system. That is probably what all the booking engines would need to do to be able to make a meta engine possible.
I wouldn't be surprised if Google builds a travel Web site...
http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/060417-091220
There was some talk about partnership between Google, LP, and Travelocity:
http://www.hostelmanagement.com/sect...ity-to-partner
I don't think Hostelworld is a bad thing. They send a lot of bookings to the hostels. If it weren't Hostelworld, it would be someone else. They have definitely dominated the industry though and made it difficult for others to break in. They are better than some of the hotel booking engines which take an incredible booking commission -- I can't remember the exact number that I heard recently. It might have been something like $25 (USD) minimum commission on a room, even if your rooms are only selling for $60 per night.
|
Well, I'd like to tell you a story instead. Here in Hungary we no fast food restaurants 20 years ago due to the Iron Curtain. We had nice little family restaurants instead. Since changing of the system, we have McDonalds, Burger King, KFC almost every corner. Guess how many people are eating in those little places with loads of atmosphere?
As you can see, relating to the new trends of travelling, Hostelworld is more oriented to offer Hotels instead of Hostels, obviously because they get more commission of it. As Hostelworld originally was based on serving low-budget tourists (they had the maximum 3 star hotels listed) , Boo.com is open for the 4-5 star hotels as well. If, let say, all your "rollie-pollies" (those guests who rather use the rolling cases instead of backpacks) would stay in hotels instead, how many people would stay in your hostel?